From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8a7E-0000ql-QA for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:34:57 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2GGQ8cs005079 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:26:08 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04374-07 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:26:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2GGQ0rK005072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:26:01 GMT Message-ID: <1331915160.18586.202.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:26:00 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4F636283.7040800@linux.intel.com> References: <5ca651eb19c3fcb64de2ce405de0bc7fa2a8c90b.1331848750.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> <4F635D37.2020406@linux.intel.com> <4F636283.7040800@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rt-tests: Add src/backfire to FILES_${PN} X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:34:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 08:55 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > On 03/16/2012 08:33 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > > Hrm, this silences the warnings, but the backfire sources are not > > installed on the rootfs.... > > > > Anyone see what is wrong with the below? Is there some magic that purges > > /usr/src in a minimal build? > > I was adding "/usr/src/backfire" to FILES_${PN}. It seems one should add > "/usr/src/backfire/*" to actually get the files. > > However, I am surprised that the warnings went away and the files were > still not packaged when I used "/usr/src/backfire". Is this expected > behavior? > > I have pushed the new version to the same branch using > "/usr/src/backfire/*". Built,booted,and verified on qemux86 using > core-image-rt. FWIW with your original patch I'm seeing things being correctly packaged in the main package (rt-tests) which is consistent with the warning message being fixed. Cheers, Richard