From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAV9h-0005tP-28 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:41:25 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2LNTt4e007616; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:29:55 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07350-04; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:29:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2LNTkFV007610 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:29:48 GMT Message-ID: <1332372589.9740.225.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=E9nard?= Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:29:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20120321230914.37861302@eb-e6520> References: <20120321180748.7cc58e67@eb-e6520> <20120321185216.440a6353@eb-e6520> <20120321190208.25dc0387@eb-e6520> <20120321203249.54411613@eb-e6520> <20120321194906.GC3659@jama.jama.net> <20120321220253.00c4f254@eb-e6520> <20120321223521.36e49bba@eb-e6520> <20120321230914.37861302@eb-e6520> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Martin Jansa , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "gdb-cross-canadian: build gdb with python support" X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:41:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry to interject into the middle of this but I have a sudden idea. I suspect Nitin is using rpm and the people with successful builds are using ipk. Further, I suspect that rpm is including python-nativesdk whilst the ipk version might not be due to its slightly better dependency detection. So this could be something wrong with the python-nativesdk. I'd be interested to see if this fails for Martin/Eric if they manually include python-nativesdk. Nitin, you could also try an ipk build. Cheers, Richard