From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SB0ka-0005wz-Kb for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:25:37 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2N9GfPi024855 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:16:41 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22937-06 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:16:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2N9GUAc024848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:16:32 GMT Message-ID: <1332494193.9740.382.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:16:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1332485029-9148-1-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> References: <1332485029-9148-1-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: populate /etc/modules-load.d/ with module_autoload entries too X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:25:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 07:43 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > * /etc/modules-load.d/foo.conf is used by systemd like /etc/modutils/foo was with sysvinit > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa > --- > meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Since these look identical couldn't we symlink them? I'm not a big fan of writing duplicate data to a package :/. Cheers, Richard