From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SBNwe-00016M-1p for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:11:36 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2OA2daG004967 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:02:39 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03056-03 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:02:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2OA2UcQ004961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:02:30 GMT Message-ID: <1332583353.9740.500.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:02:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: <313583f23e026bed3155643d1e8914313fce7478.1332541342.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> References: <313583f23e026bed3155643d1e8914313fce7478.1332541342.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCHv 08/10] libusb*: import native support from meta-oe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:11:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 23:30 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa > --- > meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb | 7 +++++-- > meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1_1.0.8.bb | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Looking at this, it makes no sense. Why does our build system need to be trying to extract information from the *native* system's USB bus? I can understand pango and cairo for font rendering in something like icons but libusb-native? Are you really sure we need this and have no other options as I can't see it actually being used... Looking at the other patches, I'm guessing they're broken without your PACKAGECONFIG change to fix -natives. A goal of this release is to have everything building and working that we ship. These 'simple' BBCLASSEXTENDs are likely going to change that. I don't really want to spend my weekend trying to fix and then test the PACKAGECONFIG change so I can merge these patches, particular as I've spent most of the week including the evenings just getting things to build. Arguably there could be other PACKAGECONFIG issue already I guess so we probably should fix that before release anyway. With -rc1 on Monday, that will be tricky :(. Cheers, Richard