From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SC87x-0001b8-Kn for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:30:21 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2QBLNwt024697 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:21:23 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17410-10 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:21:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2QBLGvT024690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:21:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1332760875.28414.107.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:21:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1332759991.14363.1027.camel@phil-desktop> References: <1332694123-5078-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1332759689.28414.104.camel@ted> <1332759991.14363.1027.camel@phil-desktop> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] tune/armv7: Add -mthumb to TUNE_CCARGS X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:30:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:06 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:01 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Looking at this file, if the above is true and armv7 can't do anything > > other than thumb, shouldn't we just delete the non-thumb configurations > > for "armv7"? > > It's not totally obvious to me that having a "lowest common denominator" > configuration for ARMv7 is really all that valuable. In fact I would be > slightly surprised if anybody is targetting ARMv7-M with OE at all. > What's the use-case for that? I have no idea, it appears the file doesn't make a lot of sense... Cheers, Richard