From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCp7Y-0002NH-Cs for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:24:49 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2S9Fkr2018209 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:15:46 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15632-08 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:15:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2S9Fcqj018202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:15:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1332926139.28414.194.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:15:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] local.conf.sample.extended: The set for archiving packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:24:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 10:24 +0800, Xiaofeng Yan wrote: > From: Xiaofeng Yan > > User can use these variables to get atchiving packages they want. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan > --- > meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample.extended | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) This commit introduced duplicate information as Chris noted. I also thought we could make it clearer so in the end I pretty much rewrote it (to mention INHERIT += too). I've merged a patch along these lines which should complete this series now. I would note that a few people have ideas for cleanups to the code. For example, rather than figuring out .bb and .inc files as you do now, there is a bitbake variable you can look at to get this information. I'm seeing the merged code as a first draft of this which we can now iterate over and improve. As such I'll take improvement patches. Cheers, Richard