From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHa0x-00084s-6m for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:17:40 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3AC8Ile025332 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:08:18 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23457-02 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:08:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3AC89Z6025318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:08:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1334059689.6861.64.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:08:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <0953244152d03d27f6c60729c58484af81f95a1d.1334027369.git.lianhao.lu@intel.com> <637B72D9-1F2D-4CD3-8903-36E73E7CC465@dominion.thruhere.net> <3FB0FE38-93D2-44D1-9BFF-2E742A8BEA92@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] connman: optionally build ofono plugin. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:17:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:24, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Can you clarify what is your concerns? > > > > It changes the default behaviour. There shouldn't be any behaviour changes so late in the release cycle. > > And apart from that, it should use PACKAGECONFIG :) > > I agree about PACKAGECONFIG but this behaviour change seems acceptable > for me since most users won't be using 3g and will be not affected by > this. So how about we just add ophono to DEPENDS for 1.2 (since its implied and enabled as things stand) and then in 1.3 we use PACKAGECONFIG? Cheers, Richard