From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SJoMs-0000fs-8a for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:01:30 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3GFq5UN001579 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:52:05 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00791-05 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:52:01 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3GFpuAr001572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:51:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1334591518.616.6.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:51:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1334569676.16992.67.camel@ted> <111FD132-7323-472B-8052-283E454DCB6E@dominion.thruhere.net> <1334574653.16992.74.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] python: Fix re-execution problem due to patching configure and configure.in X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:01:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 08:31 -0700, Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > >>> Since this changes the sources it needs a PR bump. > >> > >> It has no effect on the packaged output which was always the criteria > >> for PR bumps as I understood things. > > > > But there's the exception for fixing failures like this so people don't have to -c clean(sstate) things. > > Indeed, I had to do a manual -c cleansstate to get the benefit of this > batch of rebuild fixes. The rebuilds all failed otherwise. I did go back and add in a bunch of PR fixes but evidently not enough :/. Cheers, Richard