From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKV2p-0001tx-Sv for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:35:40 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3IDQCbx001779 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:26:12 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32694-09 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:26:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3IDQ6uE001773 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:26:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1334755569.24091.94.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:26:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9F52A267-E108-405D-BD39-ADA0209B3620@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <484d14f90205202e85346dfc53fcc4a273b3087c.1334751924.git.dongxiao.xu@intel.com> <9F52A267-E108-405D-BD39-ADA0209B3620@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] packageinfo.bbclass: A workaround for RPM architecture renaming X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:35:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 15:11 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 18 apr. 2012, om 14:48 heeft Dongxiao Xu het volgende geschreven: > > > For beagleboard platform, the PACKAGE_ARCH for certain recipes is > > "armv7a-vfp-neon", however, the architecture label in RPM file name is > > "arm" due to a potential bug in RPM backend. > > 'arm' or 'armv7a'? Your commit message doesn't match the comment in the code. Since Dongxiao is probably about to go to sleep, he means "armv7a". I'd wondered that when I looked at the commit message too. Cheers, Richard