From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SMcQ8-0006ao-5m for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:52:28 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SMcGt-0000o0-W4 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:42:56 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:42:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <857BE142E5399E46B20FD45B9DB8A7BC0FD735E3@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <857BE142E5399E46B20FD45B9DB8A7BC0FD735E3@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1335260575.27021.64.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: is the virtual package -tanslation correct? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:52:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:33 +0000, Lu, Lianhao wrote: > I found that in package.bbclass when generating the -locale packages, it sets RPROVIDES to provide the virtual packages -translation, > d.setVar('RPROVIDES_' + pkg, '%s-locale %s-translation' % (pn, ln)) > > This would result different real packages provide the same -translation, i.e. eglibc-locale-ca and glib-2.0-locale-ca will both RPROVIDES ca-translation, even though they contain different messages. > > Is it desirable or should we remove the -translation in RPROVIDES? Yes, that is the intended behaviour. This is necessary to support dynamically installed language packs. p.