From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SMdRH-00011E-8v for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:57:43 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SMdI3-0000TF-1d for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:48:11 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:48:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1335264349.12692.120.camel@ted> References: <857BE142E5399E46B20FD45B9DB8A7BC0FD735E3@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1335260575.27021.64.camel@phil-desktop> <1335264349.12692.120.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1335264491.27021.66.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: is the virtual package -tanslation correct? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:57:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:45 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:42 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > Yes, that is the intended behaviour. This is necessary to support > > dynamically installed language packs. > > What uses this out of interest? I'm not entirely sure to be honest. We used to use it quite heavily in Familiar but I have no idea whether Angstrom does the same. The systems I'm working on nowadays don't tend to require language packs so I haven't personally used that mechanism for a while. p.