Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: is the virtual package <locale>-tanslation correct?
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:33:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1335285237.21409.19.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335264491.27021.66.camel@phil-desktop>

On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:48 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 11:45 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 10:42 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > Yes, that is the intended behaviour.  This is necessary to support
> > > dynamically installed language packs.
> > 
> > What uses this out of interest?
> 
> I'm not entirely sure to be honest.  We used to use it quite heavily in
> Familiar but I have no idea whether Angstrom does the same.  The systems
> I'm working on nowadays don't tend to require language packs so I
> haven't personally used that mechanism for a while.

How did the system use this? I can imagine querying the list of
installed packages and then attempting installing xx-locale as a resuilt
but I'm not sure how this other provider helps?

As far as I know, opkg doesn't directly support anything like this?

Cheers,

Richard




  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-24 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-24  9:33 is the virtual package <locale>-tanslation correct? Lu, Lianhao
2012-04-24  9:42 ` Phil Blundell
2012-04-24 10:45   ` Richard Purdie
2012-04-24 10:48     ` Phil Blundell
2012-04-24 16:33       ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-04-24 16:47         ` Phil Blundell
2012-04-24 19:59           ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1335285237.21409.19.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox