Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: SetScene tasks hang forever?
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 20:52:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336593138.2494.72.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FAAAEB6.2060703@palm.com>

On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:51 -0700, Rich Pixley wrote:
> On 5/8/12 05:34 , Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 10:36 -0700, Rich Pixley wrote:
> >> Any other ideas?
> > Well, this clearly doesn't happen with master or in any combination of
> > the layers most users are using. The logical conclusion would be that
> > there is something in your layer that is somehow triggering this.
> No private layer involved.
> 
> I do have a makefile which encapsulates the environment stuff, but 
> that's it.
> > Of course since that layer is secret and you can't show us it, we have a
> > bit of a problem. Can you reproduce the bug against public code?
> Done.  (Our layer is becoming open, we're committed to it, but it's a 
> long process internally).
> > Are you by any chance setting BB_STAMP_POLICY somewhere?
> Yes.  BB_STAMP_POLICY = "full".
> 
> I'll attach a copy of my local.conf and bblayers.conf.

I'm 95% sure its BB_STAMP_POLICY = "full" causing the problems. The idea
is really that sstate and other recent developments obsolete the "full"
stamp code. I'm not sure it actually gets on with the setscene stamps
the sstate code generates, as I suspect you're discovering.

We could try and fix the "full" policy, or we could just remove it.
Looking at the code for the function that deals with this in
runqueue.py, I can see where problems could occur.

So I guess I'm asking if we should fix that or can we remove it?

Cheers,

Richard





  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-09 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-02 18:21 SetScene tasks hang forever? Rich Pixley
2012-05-02 18:40 ` Mark Hatle
2012-05-02 19:16   ` Rich Pixley
2012-05-02 19:40     ` Mark Hatle
2012-05-02 19:45       ` Rich Pixley
2012-05-02 19:48         ` Mark Hatle
2012-05-02 23:06           ` Richard Purdie
2012-05-06 17:36             ` Rich Pixley
2012-05-07 16:38               ` Rich Pixley
2012-05-08 12:34               ` Richard Purdie
2012-05-09 17:51                 ` Rich Pixley
2012-05-09 19:52                   ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-05-09 23:04                     ` Rich Pixley
2012-05-09 23:26                       ` Richard Purdie
2012-05-10  0:03                         ` Rich Pixley
2012-05-09 20:32                   ` Richard Purdie
2012-05-09 23:20                     ` Rich Pixley
2012-05-09 23:32                       ` Richard Purdie
2012-05-10  0:00                         ` Rich Pixley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1336593138.2494.72.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox