From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SSGWM-0002o2-8i for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 01:42:14 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q49NWLTU029043 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 00:32:21 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25795-03 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 00:32:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q49NWAx8028991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 00:32:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1336606329.2494.105.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 00:32:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4FAAFBB5.10004@palm.com> References: <4FA17B2A.5060903@palm.com> <4FA17FA7.9030805@windriver.com> <4FA187F4.9040003@palm.com> <4FA18DA7.6010205@windriver.com> <4FA18EC8.5040504@palm.com> <4FA18F9D.5090805@windriver.com> <1335999994.30113.39.camel@ted> <4FA6B6AC.60301@palm.com> <1336480442.25084.74.camel@ted> <4FAAAEB6.2060703@palm.com> <1336595524.2494.77.camel@ted> <4FAAFBB5.10004@palm.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: SetScene tasks hang forever? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 23:42:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:20 -0700, Rich Pixley wrote: > My rebuild completed in 5 seconds. > > Thank you very much! > > I'd rather not fork bitbake locally. Can I expect this patch to show up > in git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake sometime soon? Yes, I just wanted to confirm we were fixing the right problem... I'll post it to the bitbake list and merge in a day or two assuming no negative feedback. I still wonder if that stamp mode is useful but that is a different discussion. Cheers, Richard