From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SfFfE-0001ms-B6 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:25:04 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5EJERj6005142 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:14:27 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04393-10 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:14:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5EJEIXh005135 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:14:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1339701258.24333.98.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:14:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4FDA340C.5070300@linux.intel.com> References: <1339487948-30612-1-git-send-email-bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> <4FDA340C.5070300@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] strace: update to 4.7 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:25:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 11:57 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On 06/12/2012 12:59 AM, Bogdan Marinescu wrote: > > Removed the x32 specific patches, since they seem to be fully > > integrated into 4.7. Also removed the sigmask patch, since the > > new version doesn't seem to use sigmask anymore. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu > > --- > > .../strace/strace-4.6/sigmask.patch | 23 - > > .../strace-4.6/strace-4.6_add_x32_support.patch | 1242 -------------------- > > meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.6.bb | 23 - > > meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.7.bb | 20 + > > 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1288 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace-4.6/sigmask.patch > > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace-4.6/strace-4.6_add_x32_support.patch > > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.6.bb > > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.7.bb > > > Did you do a git mv? by removing and creating, the git history gets > lost, can you respin this? This is an urban myth. git does not track renames, ever. Some of the tools can detect and display things with "rename detection" though. So the patch was just sent without rename detection, it will make no difference to the history whatsoever if merged. It can be harder to review though. Rename detection doesn't always work in the cases of large delta, the exact threshold can be configured. Cheers, Richard