From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SlnBE-0003cP-8j for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:25:08 +0200 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.6]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sln0W-0000i3-5x for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:14:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1341259953.2886.29.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 21:12:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <28adf5fdb58c3409ec2dcc1a8dfffaaf2a8eab2b.1341032578.git.mark.hatle@windriver.com> References: <28adf5fdb58c3409ec2dcc1a8dfffaaf2a8eab2b.1341032578.git.mark.hatle@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] image.bbclass: Add support to build the SDK in parallel with the image X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:25:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 00:07 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass b/meta/classes/image.bbclass > index 4f50376..7e41982 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/image.bbclass > @@ -3,6 +3,11 @@ inherit rootfs_${IMAGE_PKGTYPE} > IMAGETEST ?= "dummy" > inherit imagetest-${IMAGETEST} > > +inherit populate_sdk_base This seems to haul a vast amount of stuff into image.bbclass. Is it really necessary to have all that in there by default? p.