From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: why would a recipe have both do_install() and do_install_append()?
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:29:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1341401390.3906.12.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1207040615500.23821@oneiric>
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 06:16 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>
> > On 04.07.2012 08:32, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> i'm probably just misreading something, but what is the point of a
> > >> recipe having both a do_install() and do_install_append() function?
> > >> for example, here's part of e2fsprogs_1.42.1.bb:
> > >>
> > >> do_install () {
> > >> oe_runmake 'DESTDIR=${D}' install
> > >> oe_runmake 'DESTDIR=${D}' install-libs
> > >> # We use blkid from util-linux now so remove from here
> > >> rm -f ${D}${base_libdir}/libblkid*
> > >> rm -rf ${D}${includedir}/blkid
> > >> rm -f ${D}${base_libdir}/pkgconfig/blkid.pc
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> do_install_append () {
> > >> # e2initrd_helper and the pkgconfig files belong in libdir
> > >> if [ ! ${D}${libdir} -ef ${D}${base_libdir} ]; then
> > >> install -d ${D}${libdir}
> > >> mv ${D}${base_libdir}/e2initrd_helper ${D}${libdir}
> > >> mv ${D}${base_libdir}/pkgconfig ${D}${libdir}
> > >> fi
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> how does that differ from simply defining a single do_install()
> > >> routine? i'm willing for this to be a dumb question.
> > >
> > > it does not. I think it could be arguably done in same do_install
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > but it does have some logical separation where the append operation is
> > > moving files from /lib to /usr/lib
> >
> > It would be better to just use a comment and/or empty line for logical
> > separation.
> >
> > > in theory another use of it is that you can override do_install_append
> > > in a .bbappend file
> > > and still reuse the do_install.
> >
> > AFAICT, you can't override an append. Both appends, the original and the
> > bbappended, would get executed.
>
> ok, now i *definitely* want to know whether this would work or not
> since there are a few recipes that define both do_install() and
> do_install_append().
Andreas is correct, you can't override a do_install_append (), both
would just get appended.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-04 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 2:22 why would a recipe have both do_install() and do_install_append()? Robert P. J. Day
2012-07-04 6:32 ` Khem Raj
2012-07-04 10:04 ` Andreas Oberritter
2012-07-04 10:16 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-07-04 11:29 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-07-05 5:39 ` Khem Raj
2012-07-05 10:14 ` Robert P. J. Day
2012-07-05 17:32 ` Scott Garman
2012-07-09 10:08 ` Andrei Gherzan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1341401390.3906.12.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox