From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmRgo-0007u9-5L for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:40:26 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmRW9-0002c9-75 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:29:25 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:29:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120704150005.GD1817@windriver.com> References: <4FF0C930.4000104@linux.intel.com> <1341207885-9463-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <4FF33085.1070703@linux.intel.com> <20120704141259.GA1817@windriver.com> <20120704150005.GD1817@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1341415765.20265.30.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] u-boot recipe updates X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:40:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:00 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > I've found Richard's comments [looking in OE archive and not poky > helped] and will test what he proposed to replace FILESDIR. But I still > think it extremely worthwhile if some fine tuning to the mailing list(s) > can be done to address what I mentioned below. Can you be more specific about what you think should be changed? If I look at the message of yours that I'm replying to, it has: Return-Path: Received: from linuxtogo.org ([188.40.83.200]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmR3u-0002an-JT for pb@pbcl.net; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:00:14 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmREX-0006Iq-NQ; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:11:13 +0200 Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SmREW-0006Ih-OQ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:11:13 +0200 [...] From: Paul Gortmaker To: Saul Wold Message-id: <20120704150005.GD1817@windriver.com> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org which all seems in order. Which part do you think is wrong? > > On a related note, is it possible to fix the mailing list so that it > > does not strip To/Cc information and Message-ID strings? [I'd have to > > check -- maybe it is (also) inserting a needless Reply-To: header that > > messes things up.] > > > > Further, without a proper Message-ID, it breaks patchworks, so Richard's > > comments should be here: p.