From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SoHVC-0005sM-Un for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:12:03 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q69H0skN009145 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 18:00:54 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08270-09 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 18:00:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q69H0ln4009139 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 18:00:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1341853247.8066.36.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:00:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: tcf-agent, matchbox-wm-2: Correct "proto=git" to "protocol=git". X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:12:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 12:27 +0300, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > "proto=git" is not a valid parameter for the git fetcher. > > NOTE: package matchbox-wm-2-0.1+git1 > +01fa5465743c9ee43d040350f4405d35293e4869-r1: task do_fetch: > Succeeded > > Anyway, in the git.py, code is searching for "protocol" parameter: > ud.proto = ud.parm['protocol'] > > ... so your change seems legit. > > On another hand, svn.py is using: > proto = ud.parm.get('proto', 'svn') > > A good think would be to use the same parameter names for all > protocols. > I agree but how do we do this without breaking the world? We probably should try and standardise it, probably to "protocol". Cheers, Richard