From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SoJUo-0000uD-8h for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:19:46 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q69J8ZUe009980; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:08:35 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09244-04; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:08:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q69J8OHx009974 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 20:08:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1341860905.22321.1.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 20:08:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1341849720.20265.64.camel@phil-desktop> References: <4FF0C930.4000104@linux.intel.com> <1341207885-9463-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <4FF33085.1070703@linux.intel.com> <20120704141259.GA1817@windriver.com> <20120704150005.GD1817@windriver.com> <1341415765.20265.30.camel@phil-desktop> <20120705161402.GA2309@windriver.com> <1341849720.20265.64.camel@phil-desktop> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Phil Blundell Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] u-boot recipe updates X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:19:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 17:01 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 12:14 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:00 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > > > On a related note, is it possible to fix the mailing list so that it > > > > > does not strip To/Cc information and Message-ID strings? [I'd have to > > > > > check -- maybe it is (also) inserting a needless Reply-To: header that > > > > > messes things up.] > > > > Your mail suffers the exact same problem. My address is nowhere to be > > seen on the To/Cc: I only happened to see it since I told mutt to > > show me all archived poky/oe mails with u-boot in the subject. > > Otherwise your message would have been lost in the noise, perhaps seen > > next week when I return from OOO. > > > > And when I hit reply, it won't go to you unless I tell mutt to ignore > > the broken Reply-To line. It is the line right at the bottom: > > Ah, I see. So, just to be clear, the mailing list isn't stripping > anything: the reason that your address doesn't appear in To/Cc is, as > you suggest, purely because the Reply-to: header which mailman inserts > tends to cause replies to be sent only to the list. > > I tend to agree with you that the Reply-to header is a bad idea and it > would be better off disabled, but this is a list policy decision and > Richard, as the administrator, would need to decide whether he wants to > disable it or not. I'm fairly indifferent about this and happy to change it unless anyone can think of a good reason why its list this. I would note that whilst in theory I might admin the list, I don't have any of the list admin password for this list or the tsc one for that matter, only that for bitbake-devel. Phil, perhaps we could discuss this offline :) Cheers, Richard