From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SoeB4-0006eY-80 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:24:46 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Soe0H-0004Ou-NF for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:13:37 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:13:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1341940070-27715-2-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> References: <1341940070-27715-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1341940070-27715-2-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1341940417.20265.92.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kernel.bbclass: Make tree available for cross building external modules X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:24:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 10:07 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > We shave too much from kernel sources for making it work > for on device external kernel module development that cross > development of external modules wont work from same tree > anymore. This patch makes a copy of tree which will eventually > be staged for building external modules Why does cross development require more of the kernel tree than on-device compilation? p.