From: "Anton Antonov" <anton.antonov@arm.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cargo.bbclass: allow to avoid appending PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 09:39:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13420.1747413559731422430@lists.openembedded.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANNYZj8WRTH0He_BcxPt4q5VeHHkG8qyTFHfKL-_LGiuYstxVw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1176 bytes --]
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:55 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>
> If you need to supply these
> arguments some other way, then you can follow for example mesa.inc and
> define empty PACKAGECONFIGS:
>
> PACKAGECONFIG[amd] = ""
> PACKAGECONFIG[svga] = ""
> PACKAGECONFIG[virgl] = ""
>
> And then use them to form a custom variable, which you can use as you see
> fit:
>
> GALLIUMDRIVERS:append = "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG',
> 'gallium-llvm', '${GALLIUMDRIVERS_LLVM}', '', d)}"
> GALLIUMDRIVERS:append = "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'amd',
> ',r600', '', d)}"
I think using PACKAGECONFIG to define cargo features list is a normal use-case in rust based recipes. With this change is not easily achievable because ${PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS} is unquoted in cargo.bbclass and we can't use it with CARGO_BUILD_FLAGS += " --features" if there are more than one feature.
So, if the change is not going to be reverted then we realistically have two options - either complicate the recipes with a lot of conditions like you suggest or just add a comment that oe_cargo_build() is broken in cargo.bbclass and define our own do_compile()
Anton
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1290 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 16:55 [PATCH 1/2] cargo.bbclass: show PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS in bbnote martin.jansa
2025-03-20 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] cargo.bbclass: allow to avoid appending PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS martin.jansa
[not found] ` <182E912DEB60EF95.20788@lists.openembedded.org>
2025-03-20 16:59 ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2025-03-20 17:06 ` Richard Purdie
[not found] ` <182E91CCE4A2B275.19116@lists.openembedded.org>
2025-03-20 17:16 ` Richard Purdie
2025-03-20 17:36 ` Martin Jansa
2025-03-20 17:51 ` Jean-Pierre Geslin
2025-03-20 18:11 ` [OE-core] " Jean-Pierre Geslin
2025-03-24 18:55 ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-03-24 19:30 ` Martin Jansa
2025-03-24 22:29 ` Richard Purdie
2025-03-31 16:18 ` akuster808
2025-03-31 16:28 ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-05-16 15:07 ` Anton Antonov
2025-05-16 15:55 ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
2025-05-16 16:39 ` Anton Antonov [this message]
2025-05-16 17:19 ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-05-16 17:43 ` Marko, Peter
2025-05-16 17:47 ` Anton Antonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13420.1747413559731422430@lists.openembedded.org \
--to=anton.antonov@arm.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox