Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Anton Antonov" <anton.antonov@arm.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cargo.bbclass: allow to avoid appending PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 09:39:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13420.1747413559731422430@lists.openembedded.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANNYZj8WRTH0He_BcxPt4q5VeHHkG8qyTFHfKL-_LGiuYstxVw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1176 bytes --]

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:55 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:

> 
> If you need to supply these
> arguments some other way, then you can follow for example mesa.inc and
> define empty PACKAGECONFIGS:
> 
> PACKAGECONFIG[amd] = ""
> PACKAGECONFIG[svga] = ""
> PACKAGECONFIG[virgl] = ""
> 
> And then use them to form a custom variable, which you can use as you see
> fit:
> 
> GALLIUMDRIVERS:append = "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG',
> 'gallium-llvm', '${GALLIUMDRIVERS_LLVM}', '', d)}"
> GALLIUMDRIVERS:append = "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'amd',
> ',r600', '', d)}"

I think using PACKAGECONFIG to define cargo features list is a normal use-case in rust based recipes. With this change is not easily achievable because ${PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS} is unquoted in cargo.bbclass and we can't use it with CARGO_BUILD_FLAGS += " --features" if there are more than one feature.
So, if the change is not going to be reverted then we realistically have two options - either complicate the recipes with a lot of conditions like you suggest or just add a comment that oe_cargo_build() is broken in cargo.bbclass and define our own do_compile()

Anton

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1290 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-16 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-20 16:55 [PATCH 1/2] cargo.bbclass: show PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS in bbnote martin.jansa
2025-03-20 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] cargo.bbclass: allow to avoid appending PACKAGECONFIG_CONFARGS martin.jansa
     [not found] ` <182E912DEB60EF95.20788@lists.openembedded.org>
2025-03-20 16:59   ` [OE-core] " Martin Jansa
2025-03-20 17:06     ` Richard Purdie
     [not found]     ` <182E91CCE4A2B275.19116@lists.openembedded.org>
2025-03-20 17:16       ` Richard Purdie
2025-03-20 17:36         ` Martin Jansa
2025-03-20 17:51           ` Jean-Pierre Geslin
2025-03-20 18:11           ` [OE-core] " Jean-Pierre Geslin
2025-03-24 18:55             ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-03-24 19:30               ` Martin Jansa
2025-03-24 22:29                 ` Richard Purdie
2025-03-31 16:18                 ` akuster808
2025-03-31 16:28                   ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-05-16 15:07                     ` Anton Antonov
2025-05-16 15:55                       ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
2025-05-16 16:39                         ` Anton Antonov [this message]
2025-05-16 17:19                           ` Alexander Kanavin
2025-05-16 17:43                             ` Marko, Peter
2025-05-16 17:47                             ` Anton Antonov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13420.1747413559731422430@lists.openembedded.org \
    --to=anton.antonov@arm.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox