Re: [PATCH] xz: update to 5.1.2alpha

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 13:53 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 07:10 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > This contains bugfixes from the 5.0.3 and 5.0.4 releases
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> > ---
> >   meta/recipes-extended/xz/{xz_5.1.1alpha.bb => xz_5.1.2alpha.bb} |    7 ++-----
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >   rename meta/recipes-extended/xz/{xz_5.1.1alpha.bb => xz_5.1.2alpha.bb} (86%)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/xz/xz_5.1.1alpha.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/xz/xz_5.1.2alpha.bb
> > similarity index 86%
> > rename from meta/recipes-extended/xz/xz_5.1.1alpha.bb
> > rename to meta/recipes-extended/xz/xz_5.1.2alpha.bb
> > index 7fa7177..9d68720 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/xz/xz_5.1.1alpha.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xz/xz_5.1.2alpha.bb
> > @@ -10,11 +10,8 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=c475b6c7dca236740ace4bba553e8e1c \
> >                       file://lib/getopt.c;endline=23;md5=2069b0ee710572c03bb3114e4532cd84 "
> >
> >   SRC_URI = "http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-${PV}.tar.gz"
> > -
> > -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "bb24436fa12780808e1c142980484104"
> > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "54e59a83690a4a0ec88a7d7c3bdef90c6b196c892a93463863c71c24fe87951a"
> > -
> > -PR = "r0"
> > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "9bad1e249537ce69b206815cf28ca87b"
> > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "70e792d2a67cfbb8f2dffd0feab6ca6e5a4a618d65070fb44a367629d1ba94e5"
> >
> >   inherit autotools gettext
> >
> >
> 
> How stable is this alpha release?  We don't generally take up 
> re-releases, correct?

We've talked about this before and I think this might be an exception to
the rule? I don't remember any objections at least when this question
got asked...

Cheers,

Richard