From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SrUox-0005QK-1g for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:01:43 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6IDoMKB025409 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:50:22 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24227-10 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:50:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6IDoC6h025403 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:50:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1342619416.513.7.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:50:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1342011739-6416-1-git-send-email-bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: updated to 3.4.3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:01:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:23 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Ashfield > > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A > >> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >>>> Why is recipe renamed > >>> > >>> Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 3.4.3 ? > >> > >> No one replied to my other question (or at least no one replied that I > >> noticed), about > >> why we even bothered to bump it to 3.4.3 ... > > > > Quite simply, I'm the owner of the recipe and I'm supposed to upgrade > > it when a new version appears :) > > I must have missed that .. because I'd disagree with both counts. > > - libc-headers does not need to be upgraded with every korg stable update > - it is coupled to the kernel, and I've done it in the past, and had planned to > leave it a 3.4. Bogdan: This is probably one of the cases we shouldn't automatically update just based on the output of the version checking scripts. We should only change the point release version here if there is a change to the kernel headers that we need. As for the recipe owner, this one may be best owned by Bruce but I'm open minded on that. Cheers, Richard