From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SrpI9-00030d-6a for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:53:13 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6JBfqfO001820 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:41:52 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32466-07 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:41:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6JBfjSK001814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:41:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1342698109.7940.7.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:41:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5007F0C7.90605@cisco.com> References: <1342696517-28149-1-git-send-email-mertsas@cisco.com> <20120719113512.GK3331@jama.jama.net> <5007F0C7.90605@cisco.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by tim.rpsys.net id q6JBfqfO001820 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Changed SRC_URI for eglibc repo. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:53:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 13:34 +0200, Martin Erts=C3=A5s wrote: > On 07/19/12 13:35, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:15:17PM +0200, Martin Ertsaas wrote: > >> The branches repo for eglibc is /branches, not /svn/branches. > > Are you sure? wasn't this tested on broken bitbake where protocol par= am > > was ignored and default svn:// protocol was used instead http://? > > > > Cheers, > when was bitbake fixed for this? I have commit number > a93a58b7cea2ddb9596cb4d718c0801db5d1a295 from two days ago now. Was it = a > broken bitbake? The commit immediately after that, http://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=3Db2017f493ab730d804ae44ec= 5a168d464626d046 is the fix referred to. Cheers, Richard