From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SsBDu-0001Wx-2V for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:18:19 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6KB6sKJ011669 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:06:54 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09727-05 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:06:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6KB6ksp011659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:06:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1342782398.21788.7.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:06:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120720104117.GE3534@jama.jama.net> References: <20120720104117.GE3534@jama.jama.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: Broken parallel build of gcc* X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:18:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 12:41 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > some of the recent changes seem to break the parallel build of the gcc* > > recipes which are sharing a same source directory: > > > > | $ ./bitbake gcc-cross-initial gcc-cross-intermediate gcc-cross -c cleansstate > > | $ BB_NUMBER_THREADS=3 ./bitbake gcc-cross-initial gcc-cross-intermediate gcc-cross > > | ... > > | NOTE: package gcc-cross-initial-4.7.1.0+git1+d07e24f4ab59f264d68d21838795349faab5dede-r7: task do_unpack: Started > > | NOTE: package gcc-cross-4.7.1.0+git1+d07e24f4ab59f264d68d21838795349faab5dede-r7: task do_unpack: Started > > | NOTE: package gcc-cross-initial-4.7.1.0+git1+d07e24f4ab59f264d68d21838795349faab5dede-r7: task do_unpack: Succeeded > > | ERROR: Error executing a python function in ...recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.7.bb: > > | OSError: [Errno 39] Directory not empty: '...tmp/work-shared/gcc-4.7.1.0+git1+d07e24f4ab59f264d68d21838795349faab5dede-r7/git/' > > | NOTE: package gcc-cross-4.7.1.0+git1+d07e24f4ab59f264d68d21838795349faab5dede-r7: task do_unpack: Failed > > > > It seems that the work-shared/ directory is not locked and cleaned when > > starting the second unpack. > > I can confirm the same > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-July/026174.html The autobuilder is not seeing this and I'm not seeing it locally either. This would imply there is some difference in configuration which is triggering it. rm_work* is a possibility, as could ASSUME_PROVIDED settings potentially although unlikely. Encrico: Which DISTRO are you using and do you use rm_work*.bbclass? Cheers, Richard