From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SuMGF-00064V-N7 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:29:43 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6QBIDEP020488 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:18:13 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19989-04 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:18:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6QBI5RC020480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:18:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1343301485.29991.26.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:18:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1343251261.29991.4.camel@ted> <1343288238.29991.21.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: how to properly use "EXTRA_ASSUME_PROVIDED"? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:29:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 06:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Richard Purdie wrote: > > ... snip ... > > > So its not a variable, its a parameter. You probably mean to run > > something like: > > > > bitbake -I rday-native -e core-image-minimal > > or > > bitbake --ignore-deps=rday-native -e core-image-minimal > > ok, that was embarrassing :-(, but my original question still > applies -- is there any way to see this additional ignored dependency > in the environment of my bitbake command? Not that I can think of offhand. Cheers, Richard