From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SuPuB-0003Q0-NB for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:23:11 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6QFBgjs022413 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:11:42 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21192-10 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:11:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6QFBWJ5022407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:11:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1343315490.7600.3.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:11:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1343308890.29991.30.camel@ted> <20120726144748.GD3621@jama.jama.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by tim.rpsys.net id q6QFBgjs022413 Subject: Re: autoconf broken? (was [oe] gtk+-native configure fails) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:23:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 17:02 +0200, Andreas M=C3=BCller wrote: > bitbake -e atk-native | grep ^DEPENDS >=20 > says >=20 > DEPENDS_GETTEXT=3D"gettext-native" > DEPENDS=3D"gtk-doc-stub-native" >=20 > Is it possible that >=20 > DEPENDS_virtclass-native_append =3D " gtk-doc-stub-native" >=20 > in gtk-doc.bbclass breaks dependency-chain? Its entirely possible unfortunately :( I'm not entirely sure how to fix this right now but I'm thinking about it. I'm hoping droping that line in the class might be enough. Cheers, Richard