From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SwgJH-00046H-1S for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:18:27 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q71L6mLX000509 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:06:48 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29046-09 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:06:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q71L6cH9000502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:06:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1343855199.9756.57.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 22:06:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by tim.rpsys.net id q71L6mLX000509 Subject: Re: number of tasks increased since last update X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:18:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 17:29 +0200, Andreas M=C3=BCller wrote: > Hi, >=20 > today I updated and found the the number of tasks has increased about > 400. Another strange behaviour: in my build dir there are two new > folders: >=20 > x86_64-nativesdk-angstromsdk-linux > x86_64-angstromsdk-linux >=20 > but up to now I was not interested in sdk stuff. Is that another bug > or a feature? Bug in the dbus change I think... Cheers, Richard