From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: "Yang, Liezhi" <Liezhi.Yang@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: Could we build tar-replacement firstly and not parallel if tar-replacement is needed to build
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:41:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1344325278.9756.196.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5020AED3.1020406@windriver.com>
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 13:59 +0800, Rongqing Li wrote:
> Paste a RFC PATCH
>
> [RFC PATCH 1/1] bitbake: compile tar-replacement firstly, and not parallel
>
> Compiling tar-replacement or not is decided by version of host tar,
> if the host tar version is lower than 1.23, Compiling tar-replacement
> is needed.
>
> When doing popoluate tar-replacement sysroot to write the tar to
> sysroot, but writing is not finished. other packages probably
> use the being written tar to unzip file, which will lead to failure
> and report the below error:
> "bitbake_build/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/tar: Text file busy "
>
> Now we compile tar-replacement firstly and not parallel to ensure
> that a being written tar command will not be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roy.Li <rongqing.li@windriver.com>
> ---
> scripts/bitbake | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/bitbake b/scripts/bitbake
> index 3772d82..eb6b144 100755
> --- a/scripts/bitbake
> +++ b/scripts/bitbake
> @@ -134,7 +134,19 @@ if [ $buildpseudo -gt 0 ]; then
> fi
> done
> done
> - bitbake pseudo-native $TARTARGET $additionalopts -c populate_sysroot
> +
> + if [ $needtar = "1" ]; then
> + NUM_THREAD_LINE=`grep -n "^\s*BB_NUMBER_THREADS" conf/local.conf
> |awk -F':' '{print $1}'`
> + test -n "$NUM_THREAD_LINE" &&
> + sed -i ''"$NUM_THREAD_LINE"'s/^\s*BB_NUMBER_THREADS/#\0/g' conf/local.conf
> +
> + bitbake $TARTARGET -c populate_sysroot
> +
> + test -n "$NUM_THREAD_LINE" &&
> + sed -i
> ''"$NUM_THREAD_LINE"'s/^#\s*BB_NUMBER_THREADS/BB_NUMBER_THREADS/g'
> conf/local.conf
> + fi
We are *NOT* running sed over local.conf. What is the user used a
different configuration file for example?
If you're just building tar-native, is there a parallel race possible?
I'm not sure that there is?
For the record I hate this script and what it has become, its horrible.
It started as a workaround for pseudo-native, its becoming a dumping
ground for a whole set of nasty workarounds :(.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-07 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-06 12:50 Could we build tar-replacement firstly and not parallel if tar-replacement is needed to build Rongqing Li
2012-08-07 5:59 ` Rongqing Li
2012-08-07 7:41 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-08-07 8:02 ` Rongqing Li
2012-08-07 8:57 ` Pascal Ouyang
2012-08-07 9:27 ` Rongqing Li
2012-08-07 9:03 ` Richard Purdie
2012-08-07 9:25 ` Rongqing Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1344325278.9756.196.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Liezhi.Yang@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox