From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Syiag-0002kf-4L for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 14:08:50 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q77Bv3Ox010398; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:57:03 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09711-04; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:56:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q77BuqK7010392 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:56:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1344340614.9756.225.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:56:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <541bca3bf62c2747fcc16b3fb8bc9ad468f6d4cb.1344268492.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> References: <541bca3bf62c2747fcc16b3fb8bc9ad468f6d4cb.1344268492.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto-custom: Clarify usage and clear COMPATIBLE_MACHINE X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:08:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 08:56 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > There has been some confusion over proper use of the linux-yocto-custom > recipe. It is not intended to build as is from meta-skeleton. It should > be modified via a bbappend file to provide a Linux kernel config at the > very least. > > Update the commentary to make this requirement more explicit. Add some > additional detail about how to create a bbappend file and how and when > to modify the various variables. > > Clear COMPATIBLE_MACHINE so bitbake will not attempt to build the recipe > unless the user explicitly adds there machine to the variable, which > should encourage them to read the recipe comments before attempting to > build it. > > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart > CC: Bruce Ashfield > CC: Tom Zanussi > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart Merged to master, thanks. Richard