From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SykwO-00057I-H3 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:39:24 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q77ERaW0011906; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:27:36 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11410-07; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:27:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q77ERTND011900 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:27:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1344349652.9756.261.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Bruce Ashfield Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:27:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1344008589-3660-1-git-send-email-liang.li@windriver.com> <1344348754.9756.256.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Darren Hart , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: pass STAGING_INCDIR(sysroot) to perf X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 14:39:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 10:19 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 08:56 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> Adding Richard. > >> > >> Richard: did this patch not fix the problem for you ? .. it fixes it here, and > >> should replace the patch that you made earlier today .. this may have slipped > >> through the cracks. > >> > >> I've never seen the perf slang failure, so I'm hesitant to take this > >> patch, apply > >> it and drop yours. > >> > >> Is there anyway that someone seeing this problem can test this patch ? > > > > Reproducing the problem is easy "sudo mkdir /usr/include/slang", then > > build perf. > > That's fine .. but if I take the existing patch, and drop the kernel > temp one, would > you take the change ? I'd rather not spend my time reproducing and fixing > something to generate a patch that won't be taken :) Which patch is "the existing patch"? To be really clear, I'm not hacking around this issue, I do not want /usr/include/slang in the compiler search path at all, ever. Cheers, Richard