From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T22iZ-0005Np-Ux for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:14:44 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7GG2lw3032487 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:02:47 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32260-03 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:02:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7GG2cBI032481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:02:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1345132958.14667.71.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:02:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: Dropping GTK+ 2.12 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:14:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 16:36 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi, > > GTK+ 2.12 is very, very old (2007). Does anyone still use it, or can > we drop it from oe-core? > > Actually, if anyone still wants it, can we move it to meta-oe? Do we > really need three versions of GTK+ in oe-core? It was kept for the filechooser patches. There is no other reason and it can probably be dropped. Cheers, Richard