From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4EAd-0001sz-9u for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:52:43 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7MGeYPo004749; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:40:34 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04504-02; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:40:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7MGeQnN004743 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:40:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1345653628.3907.124.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:40:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1345650627-3232-1-git-send-email-paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <1840245.41xHr4Jb3c@helios> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Paul Eggleton , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] zeroconf: remove - RFC X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:52:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 18:32 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 22 aug. 2012, om 18:11 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: > > > On Wednesday 22 August 2012 16:50:27 Paul Eggleton wrote: > >> We already have avahi in OE-Core and some cursory research suggests that > >> avahi is preferred over this package, which has apparently not seen a > >> release since 2006. Nothing in OE-Core actually refers to it, so let's just > >> remove it. > > > > Hmm, this was meant to be an RFC - I would like to give people some time to > > respond. > > IIRC gumstix used it for bonjour without bringing in the megabytes of > support needed for avahi. I'm not sure that is enough to warrant it staying in OE-Core. meta-oe might be a better fit? Can avahi be cut down for "tiny" usage though configuration? Cheers, Richard