From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4d7E-0002zQ-5e for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:30:52 +0200 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Aug 2012 12:18:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,301,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="184702242" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.220]) ([10.255.12.220]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Aug 2012 12:18:43 -0700 Message-ID: <1345749523.2988.4.camel@empanada> From: Tom Zanussi To: Bruce Ashfield Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:18:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <503472BF.5000306@windriver.com> References: <1345613248.17535.1.camel@trz-ThinkPad-T420> <503472BF.5000306@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.1 (3.4.1-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, scott.a.garman@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] [denzil] linux-yocto: make validate_branches handle non BSP branches X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:30:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 01:48 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 12-08-22 1:27 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 13:10 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> Scott, > >> > >> Here's a fix for validate_branches that comes from a pending master > >> change that I've been running for 3 weeks, and one that TomZ has tested > >> in his yocto BSP work on denzil. > >> > >> It fixes some BSP use cases that involve setting a specific SRCREV > >> on a base branch, so that a BSP branch that doesn't yet exist can > >> be created off of that known base. Previously only an existing BSP > >> branch could have it's SRCREV restricted. > >> > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > I don't see this in denzil - do you have it queued for the next pull > > request, or did it get missed? > > I was wondering the same thing, in particular, since I just made a minor > tweak to this in master (which I'll send out tomorrow). The attached > patch should also be merged to denzil. > I tried the above patch on top of the other, built and booted a qemu arm bsp generated by yocto-bsp, and didn't see any problems FWIW... Tom > Bruce > > > > > Tom > > > >> cc: Tom Zanussi > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Bruce > >> > >> The following changes since commit 73cdebf60df225ee10f2eb215935be3b61e1b831: > >> > >> documentation/dev-manual/dev-manual-kernel-appendix.xml: Add note about conflict (2012-06-29 15:54:26 +0100) > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib zedd/kernel-denzil > >> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel-denzil > >> > >> Bruce Ashfield (1): > >> linux-yocto: allow do_validate_branches to handle all branches > >> > >> meta/classes/kernel-yocto.bbclass | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > >> 1 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > >> > > > > >