From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T4xWd-0000sl-Bw for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:18:27 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7OH6G7o015611; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:06:16 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15108-04; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:06:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7OH67M1015605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:06:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1345827969.14369.87.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:06:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1345781608-2198-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <50370A1F.40401@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] iputils: Fix postinst to run on cross rootfs generation X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:18:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 09:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > >> > > Richard pointed out that with Pseudo the pkg_postinsts are un-needed, so I > > offered a different patch to that effect. > > yes I see > > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=a2bc81032c85548f7c72dc76e6020ab4df9af6de > > how does it work on device installs isnt clear to me though > > with existing patch atleast I understood that with Online Package > management the postinst would run The file has the right permissions in the package file now. This means we don't need any postinst. We used to have problems preserving permissions/owners in packages but with pseudo, we don't, that is its big win. So this was leftover stuff from a previous age :) Cheers, Richard