From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <philb@gnu.org>) id 1T6nuK-0006Xg-Kc
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:26:32 +0200
Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25]
	helo=[192.168.114.6])
	by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <philb@gnu.org>)
	id 1T6niU-0001xZ-2a; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:14:18 +0200
Message-ID: <1346267538.4396.38.camel@x121e.pbcl.net>
From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:12:18 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LbGH3HV1yQOMyoYDVR_z=34qy3riZnASGYdFtkK_XkOmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d45bc352092507d11c740fb85c37d1102fa7203d.1346250187.git.ross.burton@intel.com>
	<FF931F2C-6ABE-4F72-8FEE-90CFCE69121C@dominion.thruhere.net>
	<CAJTo0LZa4odP83UOT=1U+nan-wcOEKuRMXW3iHRv9wzD8pspDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4976204.OdG2Ohk3KU@helios>
	<CAJTo0LbGH3HV1yQOMyoYDVR_z=34qy3riZnASGYdFtkK_XkOmw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>,
	Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tzdata: install /etc/localtime alongside /etc/timezone
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:26:32 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 18:31 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Sounds like a lot of extra work when the choice is fairly clear.
> Either we don't support split file systems and mandate initramfs for
> network boots, or we do our best to support it.  With a decision on
> that the choice of cp vs ln is obvious.

Even if the TSC decides that OE-core ought still to offer the option of
split /usr, that doesn't necessarily mean that all distros will want to
take the option up.  Ideally folks who don't want/need a separate /usr
would be able to get a symlink rather than a copy.

p.