From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net)
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <philb@gnu.org>) id 1TAQeX-0006D4-60
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Sat, 08 Sep 2012 21:25:13 +0200
Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25]
	helo=[192.168.114.6])
	by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <philb@gnu.org>) id 1TAQSV-000762-Ni
	for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
	Sat, 08 Sep 2012 21:12:48 +0200
Message-ID: <1347131441.4396.229.camel@x121e.pbcl.net>
From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:10:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <ea463c5c2e0828fef97a54531320711852db6387.1340121099.git.sgw@linux.intel.com>
References: <cover.1340121099.git.sgw@linux.intel.com>
	<ea463c5c2e0828fef97a54531320711852db6387.1340121099.git.sgw@linux.intel.com>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/39] eglibc-package: Update PACKAGES and files based on new ordering
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 19:25:13 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 08:59 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> -PACKAGES = "${PN}-dbg ${PN} catchsegv${PKGSUFFIX} sln${PKGSUFFIX} nscd${PKGSUFFIX} ldd${PKGSUFFIX} ${PN}-mtrace ${PN}-utils eglibc-extra-nss${PKGSUFFIX} eglibc-thread-db${PKGSUFFIX} ${PN}-pic ${PN}-dev ${PN}-staticdev ${PN}-doc libcidn${PKGSUFFIX} libmemusage${PKGSUFFIX} libsegfault${PKGSUFFIX} ${PN}-pcprofile libsotruss${PKGSUFFIX}"
> +PACKAGES = "${PN}-dbg catchsegv${PKGSUFFIX} sln${PKGSUFFIX} nscd${PKGSUFFIX} ldd${PKGSUFFIX} ${PN}-mtrace ${PN}-utils eglibc-thread-db${PKGSUFFIX} ${PN}-pic libcidn${PKGSUFFIX} libmemusage${PKGSUFFIX} libsegfault${PKGSUFFIX} ${PN}-pcprofile libsotruss${PKGSUFFIX} ${PN}-dev ${PN}-staticdev ${PN}-doc ${PN} eglibc-extra-nss${PKGSUFFIX}" 

This turns out to break if ${base_libdir} and ${libdir} are the same
thing.  Was there a particular reason why PACKAGES needed to be
reordered for eglibc, or was it just to make it consistent with the new
bitbake.conf default?

p.