Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [PATCH] classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:58:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347281890-23781-1-git-send-email-paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Instead of using a rather error-prone method of looking for output
package files in order to determine if a package got created, use the
.packaged file within pkgdata.

This fixes two separate issues:
* Some packages apparently not being found by this code e.g. all
  apm/apmd packages when using ipk packaging.
* Buggy implementation of this checking code which triggered an
  exception during the event handler if PKGV was overridden on a
  per-package basis (as it is with external-sourcery-toolchain), which
  blocked Hob from completing parsing at 99% - fixes [YOCTO #2651].

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
---
 meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass |   34 ++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass b/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass
index 26cce60..bd7b249 100644
--- a/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/packageinfo.bbclass
@@ -14,32 +14,14 @@ python packageinfo_handler () {
                 for root, dirs, files in os.walk(pkgdata_dir):
                     for pkgname in files:
                         if pkgname.endswith('.packaged'):
-                            continue
-                        sdata = oe.packagedata.read_pkgdatafile(root + pkgname)
-                        sdata['PKG'] = pkgname
-                        pkgrename = sdata['PKG_%s' % pkgname]
-                        pkgv = sdata['PKGV'].replace('-', '+')
-                        pkgr = sdata['PKGR']
-                        # We found there are some renaming issue with certain architecture.
-                        # For example, armv7a-vfp-neon, it will use armv7a in the rpm file. This is the workaround for it.
-                        arch_tmp = arch.split('-')[0]
-                        if os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgname + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgname + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgrename + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgrename + '-' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '.' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgname + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgname + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgrename + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch + '.' + packaging) or \
-                           os.path.exists(deploy_dir + '/' + arch + '/' + \
-                                          pkgrename + '_' + pkgv + '-' + pkgr + '_' + arch_tmp + '.' + packaging):
-                            pkginfolist.append(sdata)
+                            pkgname = pkgname[:-9]
+                            pkgdatafile = root + pkgname
+                            try:
+                                sdata = oe.packagedata.read_pkgdatafile(pkgdatafile)
+                                sdata['PKG'] = pkgname
+                                pkginfolist.append(sdata)
+                            except Exception as e:
+                                bb.warn("Failed to read pkgdata file %s: %s: %s" % (pkgdatafile, e.__class__, str(e)))
         bb.event.fire(bb.event.PackageInfo(pkginfolist), e.data)
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5




             reply	other threads:[~2012-09-10 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-10 12:58 Paul Eggleton [this message]
2012-09-12 17:46 ` [PATCH] classes/packageinfo: use better method to check if package exists Saul Wold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1347281890-23781-1-git-send-email-paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    --to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox