From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TB4Cp-0005kp-Ax for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:39:15 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TB3u5-0008FT-Ud; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:19:54 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Constantin Musca Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:19:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1346924974-13859-1-git-send-email-constantinx.musca@intel.com> References: <1346924974-13859-1-git-send-email-constantinx.musca@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1347283193.2673.240.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] automake 1.12.3: fix warnings X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:39:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 12:49 +0300, Constantin Musca wrote: > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/automake/automake/no-configure.in-warn.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ > +Don't show a warning if configure.in exists > + > +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [embedded specific] > + > +Signed-off-by: Constantin Musca > + > +--- a/lib/Automake/Configure_ac.pm > ++++ b/lib/Automake/Configure_ac.pm > +@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ sub find_configure_ac (;@) > + > + if (-f $configure_in) > + { > +- msg ('obsolete', "autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac'," . > +- " not 'configure.in'"); > ++# msg ('obsolete', "autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac'," . > ++# " not 'configure.in'"); Why is this change "embedded specific"? p.