From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBCVu-0004fp-1d for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:31:30 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8AMIvF0004168; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:18:57 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03643-02; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:18:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8AMIk5W004162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1347315527.31154.12.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Colin Walters Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:18:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1347312212.1908.2.camel@lenny> References: <1347292942-7241-1-git-send-email-ross.burton@intel.com> <1347311665.1908.1.camel@lenny> <1347312212.1908.2.camel@lenny> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] webkit-gtk: work around Make bug by re-running make X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:31:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:23 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:14 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:02 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > > > > > +# fixed in Make CVS, so 3.83 won't have this problem. > > > > I know this will be painful, but did you consider looking at the make > > version and determine whether or not this workaround is necessary? > > Or actually, why not just backport the make patch into core now? We've gone around in circles on this several times. The version check complicates the code more than I'd like. Adding a make-native causes its own sets of pain and hoops we'd need to jump through. So I'm probably at the point I'll take this solution since its the "least worst" :/. Cheers, Richard