From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBm4T-0002eC-0y for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:29:33 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8CCGxJO019389; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:16:59 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19128-01; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:16:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8CCGo73019383 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:16:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1347452212.11710.2.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Vladimir Zapolskiy Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:16:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50507778.3000208@mentor.com> References: <1347444916.2122.101.camel@ted> <50507778.3000208@mentor.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-devel , openembedded-core Subject: Re: Feature Developement vs. Stablisation and Bug fixing X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:29:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 14:52 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On 12.09.2012 13:15, Richard Purdie wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I know in the past this has taken some people by surprise. Both OE-Core > > and the Yocto Project are aiming at release points every six months, > > roughly October and April. In order to prepare for those there is a > > period of 6-8 weeks beforehand which is aimed at stabilisation and bug > > fixing. > > > > We are now entering that window where we need to heavily taper off new > > features and concentrate on the quality and stability of the release > > which is scheduled for mid October. I'm not saying no new feature > > patches will get taken but I will be asking questions like "why is this > > being worked on?" and "shouldn't this wait until after release?". I'd > > really like to see effort being focused on bugs now, not enhancements. > > > > I know there are a couple of things which have been worked on for a > > while and have been slightly delayed which I'd probably lean towards > > taking (some offline postinstall work spring to mind). I was asked > > whether I'd take a binutils update in a couple of weeks and the answer > > is no, I'd very likely not as we're at the point we need to lock in on > > the toolchain now (and major kernel version). > > > > Does anyone have any questions? > > > > do you expect to have a filed bug in Yocto's bugzilla to attract attention > to a problem, or published patchset with problem description and a fix is > sufficient? It doesn't have to have a bug number to be a fix to a valid problem so as long as the problem is described in the patchset, that should be ok. Cheers, Richard