From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBnVI-0005wj-MV for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:01:20 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8CDmkJo020195; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:48:46 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19954-03; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:48:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8CDmZI3020189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:48:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1347457717.11710.12.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Bruce Ashfield Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:48:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <504F59B1.60308@intel.com> <504F5B17.5070500@windriver.com> <504F5B9A.7070501@intel.com> <1347379081.2122.48.camel@ted> <504F61BF.30902@intel.com> <1347452729.11710.7.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, Saul Wold Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment and tuning hook X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:01:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 08:58 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 09:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > >> On 09/11/2012 08:58 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:41 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > >> >> On 09/11/2012 08:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> >>> On 12-09-11 11:33 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > >> >>>> On 09/11/2012 08:17 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> >>>>> When x32 is the tuning for a x86 MACHINE, the kernel should also have > >> >>>>> CONFIG_X86_X32=y. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> This can be accomplished by adding the x32 configuraion fragment to the > >> >>>>> KERNEL_FEATURES when x32 is the tuning for a given machine. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> cc: Saul Wold > >> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield > >> >>>>> --- > >> >>>>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.4.bb | 3 ++- > >> >>>>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bb | 3 ++- > >> >>>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.4.bb > >> >>>>> b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.4.bb > >> >>>>> index 4fd3845..156fb93 100644 > >> >>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.4.bb > >> >>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.4.bb > >> >>>>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ KMETA = "meta" > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> SRCREV_machine ?= "a35693b1287c0e50cdca33a1b95af0ff48b43cd0" > >> >>>>> SRCREV_machine_qemuppc ?= "85a1190530cb5749f5f831670976b163438dc301" > >> >>>>> -SRCREV_meta ?= "d9d5fc63d8b38705036e946ea77d971d95de11ad" > >> >>>>> +SRCREV_meta ?= "e0374ce012e7e6fc8e5bb8b957addb0478950898" > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> PR = "${INC_PR}.0" > >> >>>>> PV = "${LINUX_VERSION}+git${SRCPV}" > >> >>>>> @@ -27,3 +27,4 @@ KERNEL_FEATURES_append = " features/netfilter" > >> >>>>> KERNEL_FEATURES_append = " features/taskstats" > >> >>>>> KERNEL_FEATURES_append_qemux86 = " cfg/sound" > >> >>>>> KERNEL_FEATURES_append_qemux86-64 = " cfg/sound" > >> >>>>> +KERNEL_FEATURES_append_x32 = " cfg/x32" > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Scratch this bit and below, as I think I will use the other mechanism > >> >>>> you talked about to go from a .conf file. > >> >>> > >> >>> Works for me. The meta change is staged and pushed out, I'll update this > >> >>> patch to not have the KERNEL_FEATURES portion. > >> >>> > >> >> Thanks, see my other email to RP, since x32 is a feature that any x86-64 > >> >> machine might want to enable based on the DEFAULTTUNE it makes more > >> >> sense to be in the machine config includes. > >> > > >> > No, it doesn't. > >> > > >> > What we need here is: > >> > > >> > -KERNEL_FEATURES_append = " features/taskstats" > >> > +KERNEL_FEATURES_append = " features/taskstats ${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "mx32", " cfg/x32", "" ,d)}" > >> > > >> No, this would then only address the qemu machine, what about all the HW > >> BSP that might want it, they would need to add this same line. If I add > >> the KERNEL_FEATURES_append to the arch-ia32.inc, conditional on mx32, > >> then any x86-64 BSP can just enable that TUNE, isn't that the point of > >> the machine config tuning? > > > > It is the point, however, the key part of this you're ignoring is that > > the kernel fragment management only happens for linux-yocto. Only the > > linux-yocto recipe supports the KERNEL_FEATURES mechanism. > > > > The arch-ia32.inc file and any machine config *cannot* depend on > > linux-yocto. > > > > So this glue belongs in linux-yocto. I agree is suboptimal for people > > not using it but such is life, there isn't any generic mechanism we can > > place this into. > > :) > > linux-yocto it is, I've respun the patches to include the TUNE_FEATURES check > and pushed them to poky-contrib zedd/x32: > > 7aeb32 linux-yocto/3.4: add x32 configuration fragment > d34a34c linux-yocto*: append to KERNEL_FEATURES instead of assigning > > I don't have a x32 build handy, but I assume Saul will take them for a spin. > > If you want a full resend of the series, shout and I'll git send-email them out. I've merged this, thanks. I'm assuming Saul will test the end result. Cheers, Richard