From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TEzrX-0004He-2n for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:49:31 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8L9alvR017816; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:36:47 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11861-06; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:36:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8L9ac1Y017810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:36:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1348220197.10108.34.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Enrico Scholz Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:36:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1347964372.13596.110.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Richard Purdie , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitbake.conf/gcc: Add clean masks for stamp files X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:49:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 20:03 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: > > Richard Purdie > > writes: > > > +STAMPCLEAN = "${TMPDIR}/stamps/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}/${PN}-*-*" > > Is it intended that this pattern can match unrelated packages? E.g. for > PN='gcc-cross', the mask will apply to stampfiles for 'gcc-cross-initial' > too. No, this is a problem :( I saw this last night and have been giving it some thought. We might have to put a separator into the stamp file format to make this easier to deal with. The downside is that is a TMPDIR layout change :/. The thing is the bug this solves is serious even if people only rarely hit it and I can't think of a better solution... Cheers, Richard