From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TF4PA-0003OA-C8 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:40:32 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TF4Cs-000178-An; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:27:50 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Richard Purdie Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:27:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1348237488.10108.83.camel@ted> References: <1348237488.10108.83.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1348237670.15074.234.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] bitbake.conf: Change WORKDIR to split by PN and version into seperate directories X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:40:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 15:24 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > As per the previous patch, this is really a request for comments, I can > see pros and cons... I've been using this configuration locally for quite some time (it's needed for rm_old_works in particular) and it seems to be an improvement in general. p.