From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TFqUp-00042K-FI for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:01:35 +0200 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.6]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TFqIU-0003k3-HS; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:48:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1348422391.4444.238.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Khem Raj Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:46:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1348331093.4444.218.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] util-linux: Ensure that ${sbindir} is respected X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:01:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 10:31 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > The configure script uses a hard-coded value for ${usrsbin_execdir}, > > which is the path that we know as ${sbindir}. Adjust configure to take > > this from the environment if it's set there, and have do_configure() > > pass it in. > > I think our expectation is same as what the configure is defining > which is sbin dir under exec_prefix Well, that might be your expectation, but it isn't necessarily what the user has configured. There is no guarantee that ${sbindir} will be set to that particular value, and the recipes ought to respect what it is, in fact, set to. p.