From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autotools: Remove special handling for autoconf* and automake*
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:17:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348481875.4654.9.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348330688.4444.217.camel@x121e.pbcl.net>
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 17:18 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> For reasons that are now shrouded in obscurity, autotools.bbclass
> has long contained a special heuristic to avoid attempting to run
> autoreconf when building autoconf or automake themselves. However,
> the wildcard test against PN which is used there is problematic when
> trying to build another package whose name happens to start with
> "autoconf", and in any case it is silly to do this test at runtime
> for every package. The individual recipes for autoconf and automake
> can just as easily suppress the behaviour that they don't want by
> providing a custom do_configure() method which just runs configure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
> ---
> meta/classes/autotools.bbclass | 158 ++++++++++-----------
> meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf/autoconf.inc | 4 +
> meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf/autoconf_2.69.bb | 2 +-
> meta/recipes-devtools/automake/automake.inc | 4 +
> meta/recipes-devtools/automake/automake_1.12.3.bb | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
Merged to master, thanks.
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-24 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-22 16:18 [PATCH] autotools: Remove special handling for autoconf* and automake* Phil Blundell
2012-09-22 18:58 ` Chris Larson
2012-09-24 10:17 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348481875.4654.9.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=philb@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox