From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGBdI-0007Uo-A6 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:35:44 +0200 Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGBQw-0004eX-CT; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:22:58 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Saul Wold Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:22:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50607F4E.5040300@linux.intel.com> References: <1348501103.31293.51.camel@phil-desktop> <50607F4E.5040300@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1348503778.31293.52.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: work-shared not being correctly shared X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:35:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 08:42 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > Yes, I am seeing something similar with do_patch happening twice on the > work-shared area, I talked with Richard a bit ago about it, and I am > digging into the siginfo files, you can use bitbake-sigdiff to see what > sigs are changed causing it unpack twice (or in my case patch twice). Ah, right, it seems to be rm_old_work that's causing the problem. I'll disable that for now and figure out how to fix it later. Thanks p.