From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGnVs-0000V3-4Q for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:02:36 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8Q8ngR8016704; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:49:42 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15900-03; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:49:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8Q8nVKw016698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:49:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1348649372.8662.90.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Colin Walters Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:49:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1348611089.2853.7.camel@lenny> References: <1348577690.31293.70.camel@phil-desktop> <1348610357.2853.5.camel@lenny> <1348610431.1335.11.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> <1348611089.2853.7.camel@lenny> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Phil Blundell , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] util-linux: Remove static libraries from -dev packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:02:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 18:11 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 23:00 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > > That'd be inconsistent with other packages, since we do generally build > > and ship the static libraries. Having a big switch to turn off static > > libraries globally seems like a fine plan, but I can't see any obvious > > reason why the util-linux ones are any more useless than the rest. > > Makes sense. I wonder if there are actually any users of the static > libraries. > > For what it's worth in gnome-ostree I do just globally pass > --disable-static by default. I tested this a while back to see what performance difference it made. The answer was "nothing too significant", I don't have the exact timings handy. I do remember having to exclude sqlite-native from the list since pseudo static links against it. Cheers, Richard