From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGs95-0001Zx-DU for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:59:23 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8QDkVe1020153; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:46:31 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20063-02; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:46:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8QDkMdU020147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:46:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1348667183.8662.106.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Phil Blundell Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:46:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1348655282.31293.94.camel@phil-desktop> References: <1348652719.31293.90.camel@phil-desktop> <20120926095459.GE3313@jama.jama.net> <1348653462.31293.92.camel@phil-desktop> <20120926100123.GF3313@jama.jama.net> <1348655282.31293.94.camel@phil-desktop> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Martin Jansa , OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-configure-cross: factor out --enable-threads argument into ${GCCTHREADS} X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:59:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 11:28 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:01 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Sorry I haven't noticed that it's the same value as before. > > > > But if it causes different sstate checksum than PR bump would be nice to get new > > builddir (well maybe not needed after f15f61af77cc4e52a037f509f8e49e1ea530cf35). > > OK. In that case I'll leave the patch alone for now and see if Richard > will swallow it as it stands. I've merged it, lets see how that previous commit stands up to this test. I did change it to ?=, not that it matters a great deal. Cheers, Richard